gullfo wrote:Source of the post coolio. i was going to add - did you shoot the REW with the doors open or closed? if they were open it would likely account for the energy loss in 146-167 range. one thing to note - the side-to-side L and R monitors are fairly consistent. so the symmetry is decent. the scan you shared was +/- 4.5db (decent) so getting to 2.5db is excellent!
Hi Gullfo,
Yes ... doors were Open ... which is my preferred way of working.
Thanks for looking over the REW file ... it is important I get your view on it ... THANKS.
'UN-corrected' was not a good, working response. But after the 'tweak', I'm liking it !
I'll be spending time going through plenty of References, and other Projects. [for however long].
Then ...... my 'Filter Guy' wants me to do a 9-point REW shoot.
That is a bit more involved, especially measuring out the coordinated, but the basic area is:
1. Center point at ear height [same as we did for the single point shot].
2. about 6" above the head, and about shoulder distance away, 6" forward and back [top of the cube].
3. Then, about 6" below center, using the same cube corners.
He doesn't thing that the spectral curve would change much ... but I think he's looking at timing, and averaging to the prime
center point.
To note, although he has other commercial products that do this [Accurate, Lens, and others], we're doing this all with free software.
He says that the 'automatic' programs can easily misinterpret things [like modes, nulls], saying human intervention is needed to
be sure the correction is applied properly.
What he has shown me, with my Room as example, is making sense ... so I'll be interested in what the next level might be.
Kinda exciting !
Will report as things develop.
Thanks again Gullfo for your Design .... and guidance!
RJH